|
|
The web's most comprehensive resource on securitization |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Securitization market in Singapore This page updated regularly deals with securitization developments in Singapore. If you have any news or development to contribute to this, please write to me.
Updates:See a news item on a synthetic CLO in Singapore by DBS Bank.Market developments:
Diners Club has also to its credit a recent transaction. This was a 300 year Sing $ 100 million transaction backed by credit card receivables. Legal features: Singapore by and large adopts the English common law system. Assignment of actionable claims requires legal notice to the debtor under sec. 4 (6) of the Civil Law Act. Hence, in order to avoid debtor notification, assignments in Singapore will have to be equitable assignment. [For meaning of equitable assignments, see report on Malaysia - click here.] Equitable assignment has its own risks, such as existence of prior or superior claims, rights of set-off etc. Not being the legal owner of the receivables, the securitisation SPV cannot bring claims against debtors in its own name and would have to depend on the originator. In case of mortgage loans, the transfer of receivable would also entail the transfer of the underlying mortgage, which would require compulsory registration with Registrar of Titles and Deeds. See below for Monetary Authority of Singapore's regulatory pronouncement on the subject. Tax laws: Income-tax issues relating to securitisation in Singapore are the same as in most other countries. There is no specific provision relating to securitisation. Singapore has a Goods and Services Tax (GST). GST is not applicable on issue or transfer of "debt securities". It is felt that the definition of "debt securities" in Para 3 of the Fourth Schedule to the GST Act is wide enough to exclude securitised notes from the applicability of GST. Stamp duties are applicable on the assignment of mortgages at a rate of Sing $ 500. Securitisation of other receivables is exempt from stamp duty pursuant to amendments made effective from Feb. 28, 1998. Regulatory measures: An annual report for the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) indicated that the regulatory guidelines for capital adequacy treatment in case of securitisation are expected to be finalised by the third quarter of 1999. The regulatory guidelines of MAS were finalised sometime in September, 2000. The text has been further amended in July 2006 - click here to visit securitisation laws page. {body} |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Before you leave ...
Copyright ...Unless otherwise
mentioned, all materials on this site are subject to the sole copyright
of Vinod Kothari- their reproduction and use in any form is strictly
prohibited. Downloading for personal use (and not circulation) is permitted,
provided the credit of such materials to Vinod Kothari is preserved.
No permission is required for linking to any of the materials on this
site. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||