| Put your ad here - check out our very attractive terms |
The web's most comprehensive resource on securitization |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SECURITISATION
NEWS AND DEVELOPMENTS
RBI places draft report of Internal Group on Introduction of Credit Default Swaps (CDS) for Corporate Bonds
11 August, 2010: Reserve Bank of India has placed its draft report of the Internal Group on Introduction of Credit Default Swaps (CDS) for Corporate Bonds on 4th August, 2010. RBI has published draft guidelines on the introduction to CDS in 2003 and in 2007 and these were again introduced in the Second Quarter Review of Monetary Policy of 2009-10 wherein RBI proposed the introduction of plain vanilla OTC single-name CDS for corporate bonds for resident entities subject to appropriate safeguards. To provide liquidity to the corporate debt market and to provide complete and efficient markets and enable price discovery, recently, Reserve Bank of India set up an Internal Group comprising officials from its various departments to finalise the operational framework for introduction of CDS in India. The recommendations of the report are as follows:
All CDS trades should have an RBI regulated entity on one side of the transaction. Participants shall put in place a written policy on CDS which should be approved by their respective Boards of Directors. The policy may be reviewed periodically.
Key Highlight of the Report: The central highlight of the Report is that the users are not allowed to enter into synthetic transactions, that is, users can only use CDS for hedging purposes and only if they have an actual exposure in the underlying, can the users buy protection and cannot maintain naked CDS protection. The relevant extract of the text of the report is reproduced below: The users are envisaged to use the CDS only for hedging their credit risks, the Group recommended that the users shall not, at any point of time, maintain naked CDS protection. The users can, however, unwind their bought protection by terminating the position with the original counterparty. The original counterparty (protection seller) may ensure that the protection buyer has the underlying at the time of unwinding. Users are not permitted to unwind the protection by entering into an offsetting contract. In order to restrict the users from holding naked CDS positions i.e. CDS is not bought without underlying; physical delivery is mandated in case of credit events. Further, users are prohibited from selling CDS. Proper caveat may be included in the agreement that the protection seller, while entering into CDS contract / unwinding, needs to ensure that the protection buyer has exposure in the underlying. This may also be subject to rigorous audit discipline. The draft report has been placed for public comments till 4th October, 2010. See the text of the report here [Reported by: Nidhi Bothra]
To see our recent news on securitisation click here Join our mailing list for regular news fed direct into your mailbox
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Before you leave ...
|